围巾 发布的文章

自然科学类纪录片,BBC 频道 2007 年出品,是 BBC Horizon 系列之一。


The_Elephant’s_Guide_to_Sex_cover0.jpg


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/broadband/tx/elephant/

  • 中文片名 :教大象生宝宝

  • 中文系列名:BBC 地平线

  • 英文片名 :The Elephant’s Guide to Sex

  • 英文系列名:BBC Horizon

  • 电视台 :BBC

  • 地区 :英国

  • 语言 :英语

  • 版本 :TV

  • 片长 :49min

  • 发行时间 :2007

托马斯拥有一份全世界最特别的工作——给予这个星球的濒危动物以关爱。自从恐龙灭绝以来,这颗行星上的生物都面临着种族大灭绝。现在,种类灭绝的速度比在自然条件下快10000倍。托马斯博士和他的团队在动物控制方面的技巧领先世界,他们开始拯救濒危动物。

上万亿英磅曾用于研究人类繁殖,现在研究的结果也被用于拯救濒危物种。例如人工受精技术和IVF技术已成为在世界各地的动物园里成功繁育大熊猫、老虎和其他哺乳动物的关键。托马斯说:“是人导致了这些物种的灭绝危机,人类应该运用他们的智慧来拯救它们”。


The_Elephant’s_Guide_to_Sex_screen1.jpg


暂无


自然科学类纪录片,BBC 频道 2005 年出品,是 BBC Horizon 系列其中之一。


Einstein’s_Equation_of_Life_and_Death_cover0.jpg


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/einstein_equation_prog_summary.shtml

  • 中文片名 :爱因斯坦的生死方程式

  • 中文系列名:BBC 地平线

  • 英文片名 :Einstein’s Equation of Life and Death

  • 英文系列名:BBC Horizon

  • 电视台 :BBC

  • 地区 :英国

  • 语言 :英语

  • 时长 :约 48 分钟

  • 版本 :TV

  • 发行时间 :2005

In the summer of 1939 Albert Einstein was on holiday in a small resort town on the tip of Long Island. His peaceful summer, however, was about to be shattered by a visit from an old friend and colleague from his years in Berlin. The visitor was the physicist Leo Szilard. He had come to tell Einstein that he feared the Nazis could soon be in possession of a terrible new weapon and that something had to be done.

Szilard believed that recent scientific breakthroughs meant it was now possible to convert mass into energy. And that this could be used to make a bomb. If this were to happen, it would be a terrible realisation of the law of nature Einstein had discovered some 34 years earlier.

September 1905 was Einstein’s ‘miracle year’. While working as a patents clerk in the Swiss capital Berne Einstein submitted a three-page supplement to his special theory of relativity, published earlier that year. In those pages he derived the most famous equation of all time; e=mc², energy is equal to mass multiplied by the speed of light squared.

The equation showed that mass and energy were related and that one could, in theory, be transformed into the other. But because the speed of light squared is such a huge number, it meant that even a small amount of mass could potentially be converted into a huge amount of energy. Ever since the discovery of radioactivity in the late 19th century, scientists had realised that the atomic nucleus could contain a large amount of energy. Einstein’s revolutionary equation showed them, for the first time, just how much there was.

However, at the time Einstein doubted whether that energy could ever be released. By 1935 he was convinced it would never be practical. At the Winter Session of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Pittsburgh, he is quoted as telling journalists: “The likelihood of transforming matter into energy is something akin to shooting birds in the dark in a country where there are only a few birds.”

Einstein was so sceptical because attempts to break open the atomic nucleus always required more far energy be put in than was ever released. Nuclear physicists like Ernest Rutherford were exploring the structure of the atom by bombarding atomic nuclei with alpha particles. Even when machines were built to accelerate the alpha particles to ever higher speeds they had only limited success in breaking apart the nucleus. In 1933 Rutherford dismissed talk of atomic power as ‘moonshine’.

One morning in September 1933 Szilard read Rutherford’s comments in The Times. Leaving his hotel and crossing the street, he had a brainwave. Alpha particles and the other particles that physicists had been using to bombard the nucleus were simply the wrong tool for the job, because he realised that they, like the nucleus, had a positive charge.

Since like charges repel, Szilard thought, no matter how hard you fire them in, the majority would simply be deflected away. That morning he was one of the first to realise that the recently discovered neutron might be what was needed. The neutron, a subatomic particle like a proton but with no electric charge was discovered in 1932. With no charge, Szilard believed the neutron would simply slip into the heart of the atom undeflected.

But he didn’t stop there. Szilard thought that if an atom could be found that is split open by neutrons, not only would it release some of its huge store of energy, it might also release further neutrons, which could then go on and split further atoms, setting up a chain reaction leading to a truly vast release of energy. Szilard immediately saw the possible military applications and sought to patent the idea and have it made an official secret. But in 1933, the chain reaction only existed in Szilard’s head. No one had yet found an atom that could be split by neutrons.

These developments were happening against a background of extraordinary political turmoil in Europe. Hitler had come to power in Germany in January 1933. In 1938, less than a year before the outbreak of World War II, just such an atom was found, uranium.

Working at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Berlin, the nuclear chemists Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassman found that when bombarded with neutrons, uranium split into two nuclei of roughly half the size. Not only that, but further calculations showed that a large amount of energy was also released - enough from a single nucleus to move a grain of sand. The first stage of Szilard’s chain reaction had been achieved.

When he heard the news Szilard, now in New York and working at Columbia University with Enrico Fermi, set about showing whether, as well as energy, further ‘secondary’ neutrons were released. By July 1939, when he first knocked on Einstein’s door, he knew that they were and so the chain reaction was possible. Also, he and Fermi had settled on a design for the first nuclear reactor.

During the course of their conversations in the summer of 1939, Szilard explained these new developments to Einstein and his fear that the Nazis might use them to create a nuclear bomb. Together they drafted a letter, signed by Einstein, to the American President, Franklin Roosevelt. The letter was delivered to the President on the 11 October 1939 and after reading it the President provided funding for research that would pave the way for the Manhattan Project and lead, ultimately to the construction of the first atomic bomb. After signing the letter, Einstein played no further part in the development of the bomb.

With the first atomic explosion over Hiroshima, the power of e=mc² had been graphically demonstrated to the world. Just 0.6 grams of mass, converted into energy, had been enough to destroy an entire city.

Einstein was horrified when he heard that the bomb had been dropped. When they, wrote to the President, Szilard and Einstein advocated the development of an American bomb purely as a deterrent against the threat of a Nazi weapon. They had not conceived of its use as an offensive weapon, especially after the defeat of Nazi Germany.

Einstein always saw e=mc² as a purely theoretical insight and refuted any responsibility for the bomb but he did feel some responsibility for the letter he’d written to Roosevelt. A letter he would come to describe as “the one mistake” of his life. Einstein saw nuclear weapons and the nuclear arms race as a threat to the future of civilisation. In his final years he devoted much of his time and energy to issues dealing with the world’s future - advocating pacifism and campaigning for the control of nuclear weapons, not by individual nations, but by a world government. The last document he signed, just a week before he died, was a manifesto drawn up by Bertrand Russell, renouncing war and nuclear weapons. As Russell said: ““Einstein was not only a great scientist he was a great man. He stood for peace in a world drifting towards war…”

But while the bomb proved e=mc² to be the ultimate equation of destruction, only after his death has the role of Einstein’s equation in the creation of the universe become clear. Just as mass can be turned into energy in a bomb, the pure energy generated in the Big Bang condensed into the matter that makes up our world. Almost a hundred years ago, with just six short pen stokes Einstein unlocked one of the most powerful truths about the universe. A truth that would change our world, both for good and ill.


Einstein’s_Equation_of_Life_and_Death_screen1.jpg


暂无


自然科学类纪录片,BBC 频道 2005 年出品,是 BBC Horizon 系列其中之一。


Einstein’s_Unfinished_Symphony_cover0.jpg


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/einstein_symphony_prog_summary.shtml

  • 中文片名 :爱因斯坦的未竟交响曲

  • 中文系列名:BBC 地平线

  • 英文片名 :Einstein’s Unfinished Symphony

  • 英文系列名:BBC Horizon

  • 电视台 :BBC

  • 地区 :英国

  • 语言 :英语

  • 时长 :约 48 分钟

  • 版本 :TV

  • 发行时间 :2005

As Albert Einstein lay on his deathbed, he asked only for his glasses, his writing implements and his latest equations. He knew he was dying, yet he continued his work. In those final hours of his life, while fading in and out of consciousness, he was working on what he hoped would be his greatest work of all. It was a project of monumental complexity. It was a project that he hoped would unlock the mind of God.

“I want to know God’s thoughts” “I am not interested in this phenomenon or that phenomenon,” Einstein had said earlier in his life. “I want to know God’s thoughts – the rest are mere details.” But as he lay there dying in Princeton Hospital he must have understood that these were secrets that God was clearly keen to hang on to. The greatest scientist of his age died knowing that he had become isolated from the scientific community; revered on the one hand, ridiculed for this quest on the other.

It was a journey that started 50 years earlier in Berne, Switzerland. Then - in his early 20s - he was a young man struggling to make his mark. His applications to universities throughout Europe had all been rejected. In the end his father had pulled strings to get him a job as a third class clerk evaluating the latest electrical gizmos.

But in his spare time he was formulating the most extraordinary scientific ideas. In a single year - 1905, a year that would become known as his miracle year – he published papers that would redefine how we see our world and universe.

Time is relative He confirmed that all matter was composed of molecules – an idea that at the time was controversial. And most famously of all, he published the paper ‘On the electrodynamics of moving bodies’. It contained his Theory of Special Relativity and suggested that time - something that had always thought to be unchanging and absolute – was relative. It could speed up or slow down depending on the speed you were travelling. From this paper would come an additional three pages, finished in September of the same year, that would contain the derivation of e=mc², the most famous mathematical equation ever written.

Einstein was on a roll. Ten years after his Theory of Special Relativity, he published his Theory of General Relativity – a piece of work widely acknowledged as his masterpiece. The great 17th century scientist Sir Isaac Newton had described the force of gravity very successfully, but what caused gravity remained a mystery. In this Theory of General Relativity, Einstein suggested that gravity was due to the bending of time and space by massive objects. In 1919 astronomers confirmed this by measuring the bending of starlight around the sun during a solar eclipse.

The battle with quantum mechanics In 1921, Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize, not for his theories of relativity, but for another paper published in 1905. In this paper, Einstein proposed that light was not simply made up of waves, it could also be thought of as discrete, individual particles or quanta. This discovery would revolutionise physics and chemistry, because it would become one of the foundations of a new science: quantum mechanics.

But during the 1920s the new science of quantum mechanics began to turn the tide against the way Einstein saw the world. Young pretenders in the field of physics had begun to emerge, such as Heisenberg, Bohr and Schrödinger, who are now some of the most famous figures in science. But at the time they were mavericks. They saw quantum mechanics as a brand new way of interpreting everything.

A core element to their new interpretation of the world was that at a fundamental level, everything was unpredictable. You could, for example, accurately tell the speed of a particle but not – at the same time – its position. Or its position but not its speed. It meant that precise predictions were impossible – the best you could hope for was a science based on probabilities.

God does not play dice Einstein’s work was underpinned by the idea that the laws of physics were an expression of the divine. This belief led him to think that everything could be described by simple, elegant mathematics and moreover, that once you knew these laws you could describe the universe with absolute accuracy. Einstein loathed the implications of quantum mechanics. It was a clash of ideologies.

The conflict reached a crescendo in the late 1920s at the Solvay Conference in Belgium. There Einstein clashed with the great Danish physicist Niels Bohr over the nature of the universe. Einstein constantly challenged Bohr over the implications of quantum mechanics, but never budged from his belief that “God does not play dice”, meaning that nothing would be left to chance in the universe. To which the quantum mechanics community replied: “Einstein, stop telling God what to do with his dice.”

The theory of everything But Einstein had a trick up his sleeve. He had already begun a piece of work that he believed would ultimately replace quantum mechanics. It would become later known as his theory of everything – it was his attempt to extend general relativity and unite the known forces in the universe.

By completing this theory of everything Einstein hoped he would rid physics of the unpredictability at the heart of quantum mechanics and show that the world was predictable – described by beautiful, elegant mathematics. Just the way he believed God would make the universe. He would show that the way the quantum mechanics community interpreted the world was just plain wrong. It was a project that he would work on for the next 30 years, until the final day of his life.

But while Einstein’s theory of everything may be considered to have been a failure, it is an idea that still fascinates and draws some of the brightest minds in physics. Today many believe that String Theory is our best candidate for a theory of everything. But the ultimate irony is that lurking at the heart of String Theory is the very thing that, because of his beliefs, Einstein had been unable to accept: quantum mechanics.


应用科学类纪录片,BBC 频道 2012 年出品,是 BBC Horizon 系列其中之一。


Eat,_Fast_and_Live_Longer_cover0.jpg


http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01lxyzc

  • 中文片名 :进食、禁食和延长寿命 / 节食还是截寿

  • 中文系列名:BBC 地平线

  • 英文片名 :Eat, Fast and Live Longer

  • 英文系列名:BBC Horizon

  • 电视台 :BBC

  • 地区 :英国

  • 语言 :英语

  • 时长 :约 59 分钟

  • 版本 :TV

  • 发行时间 :2012

Michael Mosley has set himself a truly ambitious goal: he wants to live longer, stay younger and lose weight in the bargain. And he wants to make as few changes to his life as possible along the way. He discovers the powerful new science behind the ancient idea of fasting, and he thinks he’s found a way of doing it that still allows him to enjoy his food. Michael tests out the science of fasting on himself - with life-changing results.


自然科学类纪录片,BBC 频道 2003 年出品,是 BBC Horizon 系列其中之一。


Earthquake_Storms_cover0.jpg


http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2003/earthquakestorms.shtml

  • 中文片名 :地震爆发 / 震暴 / 世紀大地震

  • 中文系列名:BBC 地平线

  • 英文片名 :Earthquake Storms

  • 英文系列名:BBC Horizon

  • 电视台 :BBC

  • 地区 :英国

  • 语言 :英语

  • 时长 :约 59 分钟

  • 版本 :TV

  • 发行时间 :2003

Earthquakes are among the most devastating natural disasters on the planet. In the last hundred years they have claimed the lives of over one million people. Earthquakes are destructive mainly because of their unpredictable nature. It is impossible to say accurately when a quake will strike but a new theory could help save lives by preparing cities long in advance for an earthquake.

“We knew that Izmit was dangerous”

Prof Geoffrey King, Institut de Physique du Globe

The surface of the Earth is made up of large ’tectonic’ plates. These plates are in slow but constant motion. When two plates push against each other friction generates a great deal of energy. For this reason earthquakes occur most frequently on tectonic fault lines, where two plates meet. However these fault lines run for thousands of kilometres; predicting exactly where a quake will occur is nearly impossible.

Stress lines

In 1992, Dr Ross Stein was monitoring a large earthquake in a town in California called Landers. Three hours later, there was another quake 67km away at Great Bear. Stein believed that this was not simply an aftershock, instead he theorised the event at Landers had set off the earthquake at Big Bear. Stein believes that when an earthquake occurs the stress that has built up along the fault, is in part, transferred along the fault line. It is this energy transfer that causes other quakes to occur hours, days or months after the original.

Stein’s team began to look for connections between the quakes in Landers and Big Bear. They had already been working on a computer model that could help them study the relationship between earthquakes. The data collected during the Landers/Big Bear quake had enabled them to create a model that could predict where the stress from Landers would have been transferred. When they looked at the result the calculations did indeed show that the stress from Landers would have been transferred along the fault to Big Bear. They then plotted all of the subsequent ‘aftershocks’ and discovered that almost all occurred within a high-risk area they called a `red zone’. This did not prove the theory of earthquake storms though. In order to do that the quakes would have to be triggered months or even years after the original earthquake.

Scientists from around the world were attracted by this new theory and there was one part of the world where it seemed from the available evidence that the earthquake storm theory might hold true.

Tremor trail

Prof Geoffrey King was fascinated by the cyclic behaviour of the North Anatolian fault in northern Turkey. Earthquakes in the region moved from east to west with a period of quiet at the end before the cycle began again. King used the same model that had been used to show the connection between the quakes in Landers and Big Bear. The first earthquake King looked at was in the northern city of Erzican in 1939. Using the available data on that quake he found that a town to the west called Tokat was in the red, danger zone. Tokat was indeed struck by a quake in 1942. The model seemed to be working. In 1967 Adapazari, also in a red zone, was hit. It looked like stress generated in one earthquake was being transferred to the west. These could not be aftershocks as they were separated by years, not hours.

As King continued to put data into the model he discovered that a city called Izmit seemed to be the next place that would be struck. With a population of 500,000 people King and other scientists knew they needed to make this discovery public knowledge.

“Buildings can be improved. Construction can be modified”

Prof Geoffrey King

Newspapers, science journals and other publications all printed this remarkable news. Unfortunately there was not enough interest from the local community. In August 1999 King was tragically proved right when a massively energetic earthquake lasting just 45 seconds killed 25,000 people. It was a bittersweet feeling for King. On one hand he was proved right, on the other he knew that many people had lost their lives who could have been saved. King also knew that there was a high chance of more earthquakes. So using the data acquired from the Izmit quake he began to work out where the next most likely earthquake site would be.

The answer would cause a great deal of concern. At the edge of the red zone lay the city of Istanbul, home to more than four million people. The city’s high population density puts its inhabitants at maximum risk. There is good news though; if the warning from King’s team is heeded then arrangements can be made to make Istanbul safer in the event of an earthquake, whenever it happens. For now though, only time will tell if King’s prediction will prove correct.


Earthquake_Storms_screen1.jpg


暫無


应用科学类纪录片,BBC 频道 2005 年出品,是 BBC Horizon 系列其中之一。


Does_the_MMR_Jab_Cause_Autism_cover0.jpg


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/mmr_prog_summary.shtml

  • 中文片名 :药物依赖 / 灵丹

  • 中文系列名:BBC 地平线

  • 英文片名 :Pill Poppers

  • 英文系列名:BBC Horizon

  • 电视台 :BBC

  • 地区 :英国

  • 语言 :英语

  • 时长 :约 59 分钟

  • 版本 :TV

  • 发行时间 :2005

MMR 是種三合一疫苗,主要是用來對抗腮腺炎、痲疹以及風疹。有90多個國家使用此疫苗來對­抗世界最大的幼兒死因─麻疹。但是在英國接受疫苗的人數急速減少,為什麼英國的家長不­肯讓他們的孩子接受三合一疫苗呢?1998年,安德魯威克飛德在公開會議上發表三合一­疫苗的安全危機,並建議只採用單一疫苗。有些家長相信,三合一疫苗造成他們的孩子罹患­自閉症障礙及腸部病變。


应用科学类纪录片,BBC 频道 2007 年出品,是 BBC Horizon 系列其中之一。


Doctors_in_the_Death_Zone_cover0.jpg


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/broadband/tx/everest/

  • 中文片名 :死亡地带的医生们 / 珠穆朗玛峰: 死亡地带的医生们

  • 中文系列名:BBC 地平线

  • 英文片名 :Doctors in the Death Zone / Everest: Doctors in the Death Zone

  • 英文系列名:BBC Horizon

  • 电视台 :BBC

  • 地区 :英国

  • 语言 :英语

  • 时长 :59 min / EP

  • 版本 :DVD

  • 发行时间 :2007

这两部分影片关注的是一个医生团队。这队医生在攀登珠穆朗玛峰——世界最高峰时,进行着一系列的开创性实验。

实验室帐篷里的环境条件设置成-25°C,这些专家用自己的身体来进行医药实验。他们在挤压自己的身体至极限,以更好地了解人体在一个低含氧量的环境中的反应。

这个团队希望他们的工作可以为体内低氧、缺氧、受到精心护理的病患带来一种新的挽救生命的治疗方案。


军事类纪录片,BBC 频道 2003 年出品,是 BBC Horizon 系列其中之一。


Dirty_Bomb_cover0.jpg


http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00dlr2j

  • 中文片名 :脏弹

  • 中文系列名:BBC 地平线

  • 英文片名 :Dirty Bomb

  • 英文系列名:BBC Horizon

  • 电视台 :BBC

  • 地区 :英国

  • 语言 :英语

  • 时长 :约 49 分钟

  • 版本 :TV

  • 发行时间 :2003

A dirty bomb is a radiological weapon but unlike a nuclear bomb, its purpose is to contaminate rather than destroy. It uses normal explosives to disperse radioactive materials in the local environment, creating a hazard to health that could last for years unless cleaned up.

The relative ease of making such a bomb means it is a potent terrorist weapon but Horizon’s investigation shows that the risk to health from most such devices need not be great. It also underlines the need for governments to act to secure radioactive sources from falling into criminal hands. Horizon deliberately avoids outlining the production process in any detail.


自然科学类纪录片,BBC 频道 2013 年出品,是 BBC Horizon 系列其中之一。


Dinosaurs- _The_Hunt_for_Life_cover0.jpg


http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b039grrx

  • 中文片名 :恐龙: 搜寻生命痕迹

  • 中文系列名:BBC 地平线

  • 英文片名 :Dinosaurs: The Hunt for Life

  • 英文系列名:BBC Horizon

  • 电视台 :BBC

  • 地区 :英国

  • 语言 :英语

  • 时长 :约 59 分钟

  • 版本 :TV

  • 发行时间 :2013

从死亡许久的恐龙骨骼中寻找生命的痕迹听起来也许像是好莱坞的幻想,然而一位女士却在一只霸王龙的骨骼化石中找到了。Mary Schweitzer女士发现了一只死于6千8百万年前的动物中残留的红细胞及软组织。最令人兴奋的是,她相信她或许已经发现了DNA的踪迹。她的工作将使我们对于这些标志性的巨兽的认识带来革命性的进展。


自然科学类纪录片,BBC 频道 2002 年出品,是 BBC Horizon 系列其中之一。


The_Dinosaur_that_Fooled_the_World_cover0.jpg


暂无

  • 中文片名 :欺骗世界的恐龙

  • 中文系列名:BBC 地平线

  • 英文片名 :The Dinosaur that Fooled the World

  • 英文系列名:BBC Horizon

  • 电视台 :BBC

  • 地区 :英国

  • 语言 :英语

  • 时长 :约 48 分钟

  • 版本 :TV

  • 发行时间 :2002

In the mid 1800s, when Charles Darwin published his theory of evolution, one species of animal remained a mystery; where did birds fit on his evolutionary tree?

Several years later his friend and colleague, Thomas Henry Huxley, came up with an answer. Huxley had recently examined a new fossil from southern Germany called Archaeopteryx which was causing considerable excitement in palaeontological circles. There were clear signs of feathers and it was obvious this was the earliest fossil evidence of a bird ever found. Huxley noticed something else as well. To him it looked as though the skeleton bore a striking similarity to that of a family of meat eating dinosaurs known as therapods.

Transitional trail

In the 1860s, on the basis of this observation, he announced a new theory; birds must have evolved from dinosaurs. The theory ignited what was to become one of the biggest controversies in palaeontology. Could Huxley possibly be right; how could a large, land-bound creature like a dinosaur have ever evolved into something as light and sleek as a bird? Many questioned the accuracy of Huxley’s observations and ever since there has been a search for further fossil evidence to confirm the theory; a transitional animal which would incontrovertibly show how, in one creature, birds had evolved from dinosaurs. It has become one of the big missing links in palaeontology.

In Spring 1999, at the Tucson Gem and Fossil Fair in Arizona, an American collector came across a new Chinese fossil which seemed to be just this transitional animal. It had the head and upper body of a bird but the tail of a dinosaur. It was called Archaeoraptor or ‘ancient hunter’.

Chinese finds

Throughout the 1990s a number of important fossils emerged from China showing an apparent relationship between dinosaurs and birds. Practically all come from a region in the north of the country called Liaoning, one of the richest fossil areas in the world. Here, 130 million years ago, volcanic eruptions buried a wetland once teeming in wildlife. Many of the fossils have been magnificently preserved in the fine silt; some even have the remains of soft tissue attached to them. It was here, in 1996, that Chinese scientists found a creature they called Sinosauropteryx, an animal which bore many similarities to a dinosaur but appeared to have been covered in a feathery like coat. Two years later a joint Chinese/American team found an even more striking creature; a dinosaur like animal with very clear feathers which they called Caudipteryx. Other similar feathered dinosaurs followed, including in 1999, an important specimen called Sinornithosurus.

Yet to those who questioned the relationship between dinosaurs and birds, these fabulous finds raised as many questions as they answered. Were the feather-like markings really signs of feathers, or were they something else? And were the skeletons really those of dinosaurs or were they, in fact, the skeletons of new, as yet unidentified, birds? What was still missing was the piece of evidence which would satisfy everybody.

The best of both worlds

The new Archaeoraptor fossil, also from the Liaoning region of China, seemed to be just that. Here, in one animal, was a unique range of dinosaur and bird features. It had the skull and upper body of a bird, but the teeth and hands of a dinosaur. It also had the legs of a bird but the tail of a dinosaur. It was the most complete set of transitional features ever found in one creature. In November 1999 National Geographic Magazine gave it a special mention in an article about the origins of birds, calling it, “a true missing link.”.

The debate, started by Thomas Huxley in the 1860s, seemed to have been resolved. Yet within months, new finds in China showed Archaeoraptor to be an extremely clever fake. The head and upper body of a hitherto unidentified bird had been glued onto the tail of a previously unknown dinosaur.

It was a journalistic disaster for National Geographic Magazine. The fossil, however, was anything but a disaster for palaeontology. By an extraordinary stroke of good luck, as scientists in China and America examined the head and tail separately, they found that both were, in their own right, unique and extremely valuable specimens. Both, in their different ways, contained powerful evidence that birds had evolved from dinosaurs.